Generally, Larry Walsh (who is a cyclist himself) is one of the friendlies. For instance, his column two weeks ago reminding people about hunting season was (to me) a good thing, because there's a lot of people aren't synced with the hunting schedule who just don't keep track of such things.
This more recent fluff article (to me, uninformed) seems like he had another column due for November and phoned it in from Confluence.
The first line is an absolute straw man that nobody ever presented: Motorists aren't the only ones guilty of distracted riding. Did I miss it? Has anybody claimed that, so that he could shoot it down?
This column really contains three items:
1. Larry Walsh read a magazine article and repurposed the content with attribution
Instead of writing anything himself about real things in this actual area, he rewords-copies-and-pastes somebody else's stuff into his column-inches. With attribution.
2. Larry Brock is running two bike tours in the $1000 to $1500 range
3. The Mason Dixon Line is very complex.
Not likely to reverse the crisis in print journalism. Not a big day in bicycle journalism. No mention of Lance. It's not the worst thing that could happen.