BIKEPGH MESSAGE BOARD ARCHIVE

« Back to Archive
28

Pittsburgh of the Future

Cue space age music, the future is here:


http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/10347/1110389-53.stm


I like the idea for things they called "river bus" but I've cleverly identified as my favorite form of mass transit, the ferry.


ejwme
2010-12-13 19:01:14

Dig the blue sky and the blue water and all the pretty white people. I bet if their presentation had smells, there would be fresh baked goods, cinnamon and roses.


I hate to be a wet blanket, but really, this is porn. Futurists have been cranking out stuff like this for a hundred years, and the future never turns out like the fantasy.


lyle
2010-12-13 20:53:32

I bet if their presentation had smells, there would be fresh baked goods, cinnamon and roses.


cupcakes.


pseudacris
2010-12-13 20:55:27

@lyle - you mean that you don't think the rivers will end up being slightly cleaner than the cleanest spring-fed lake I've ever seen?


Cynic.


mick
2010-12-13 20:56:26

I'm a cynic for sure, BUT, I thought it was interesting that Schenley Plaza was from a student concept, according to the article. I do think different ideas would come from students since they're more likely to walk, bus, and bike around the city. And, I have to tip my helmet to Eve Picker, a developer & cyclist & one of the professors of the class that made this report. She's been WAY ahead of the downtown development pack in terms of imagining downtown as a place where people might actually want to live.


pseudacris
2010-12-13 21:17:30

oh pooh.


I like river busses (ferries!).


And if students can eliminate parking in Oakland and put in green spaces and get one way streets remarked, they can get me ferries. I believe in them. Besides, every year, there are more of them, so if this batch doesn't make good, the next might :D


ejwme
2010-12-14 01:28:14

"The Mon-Fayette Expressway is $4 billion to drive from Braddock to Oakland," he [Peduto] said. "Imagine if $4 billion were put toward this."


Not a bad tagline


salty
2010-12-14 01:44:33

I like ferries, but powerboats pollute too. Quite a bit, in fact.


lyle
2010-12-14 04:17:28


Aboard one of the abras (water taxies) in Dubai. In a city where you could spend $28,000 for one night in a hotel, I am still amazed it was only 1 dirham ($0.27 US) to cross the river in one of these. If I lived there, I'd take it everyday. Unfortunately, during my entire trip, I could count the number of bicycles I saw on one hand.


dwillen
2010-12-14 05:01:06

power boats don't pollute when they run off hopes and dreams :D


ejwme
2010-12-14 12:44:28

nice photo, dwillen


pseudacris
2010-12-14 16:28:50

@ejwme power boats don't pollute when they run off hopes and dreams


Sail boats run on hope and dreams. Power boats use fossil fuels.


mick
2010-12-14 16:41:00

water transport is probably the most fuel efficient mode of motorized transit (not counting speed boats which are stupid). i'd suppose the particulate emissions are similar to a pat bus, both being run on diesel.


what were the proposed waterbus routes?


nick
2010-12-14 17:16:17

nick - up and down the rivers, of course :D


ejwme
2010-12-14 17:32:01

Sail boats run on hope and dreams. Power boats use fossil fuels.


now i miss my (sail) boat. thanks.


cburch
2010-12-14 19:46:59

Really cool boats don't always need fossil fuels. (Admittedly, sail is still intended to be the primary power source...)


reddan
2010-12-14 20:06:31

I'd thought of a mass-pedal boat, like a 30 person version of those little two person things on ponds. That would be cool. But the off hour people would have their work cut out for them.


ejwme
2010-12-14 20:16:27

Wheels are far more efficient than propellers. Also, aerodynamic resistance saps a whole lot less energy than hull drag does. You don't get fuel-efficient ferries without hydroplanes. I don't know of any boats that use catalytic converters, and until you get into the really big boats, they exhaust underwater. Yeah, diesel bong water for the fishies.


lyle
2010-12-15 00:01:19

i can move a 100 ton barge with my bare hands.


nick
2010-12-15 01:16:24

Nick's right (maybe). Ton by ton, water travel is cheaper than the most efficient wheels. That tends to be at speeds slower than your typical randoneur, though.


mick
2010-12-15 16:03:07

water travel also has the bonus of being on water, rather than pavement. On a scale of awesomeness, water in most forms wins over pavement in most forms.


ejwme
2010-12-15 16:31:43

All this talk of sailing and ice and lakes in the other thread makes me wish I could try ice boat racing. That sht looks ridiculous.


edmonds59
2010-12-15 19:08:28

wouldn't the boat melt?


ejwme
2010-12-15 19:17:13

Ha! I guess that's why you have to go fast!


edmonds59
2010-12-15 19:20:28

heh, I guess the loser ends up in the drink, and the drinks end up in the winner.


ejwme
2010-12-15 19:22:55

i have always wanted to ice boat. it looks like so much fun.


cburch
2010-12-15 20:12:10