BIKEPGH MESSAGE BOARD ARCHIVE

« Back to Archive
17

The Ethicist weighs in on why he rolls through stop signs and red lights!

The headline for the column below seemed to distract more than reveal what the subject was about. But it's really a well thought out explanation for why he'll often roll through red lights and stop signs when he assesses that it's appropriate to do so. Seems that he was inspired by the same kind of bickering by drivers as we've so often seen here. (Hopefully, the link works.)




timschooley
2012-08-10 11:23:26

What link?


rice-rocket
2012-08-10 11:57:17

Interesting points. I have to say that I agree with most of what he says, but until we get the proper infrastructure, it may be somewhat unsafe for cyclists and still piss off motorists if we don't try to adhere to vehicular traffic laws.


stefb
2012-08-10 12:13:23

The question I always ask of people that bring up cyclists who go through stop lights is "how did it effect you?" and they never have an answer other than "it's dangerous" or "it's against the law." If going through a red light were always dangerous we wouldn't be allowed to turn on red.


rsprake
2012-08-10 12:52:40

I drove today, saw a car cut off a bus. The car was faster and smaller. Did not effect them or me. Not sure that way of thinking quite works.


Rational thinking does. A cyclist running a stop sign, or rather consciously rolling through it while still observing all other lanes can be just as safe. Can that be explained to people who don't think we belong on the road? Doubtful. Until then I will just stop and wish others would do the same understanding why they might not and knowing that in the end their rolls are not bad.


orionz06
2012-08-10 13:03:30

But what that driver did to the bus affected the people on the bus.


rsprake
2012-08-10 13:10:07

The bus did not have to change course or speed. Zero impact on the passengers.


orionz06
2012-08-10 13:42:31

So who gives a shit then?


rsprake
2012-08-10 14:06:55

Anthony Green might give a shit if he were still alive. The next time a car driver cuts off a bus there might be a bike there instead of empty road.


"Police say a woman driving an SUV tried to pass a bus and ended up hitting Green before crashing into a utility pole."


asobi
2012-08-10 15:16:36

Ethicists.


rice-rocket
2012-08-10 16:24:52

When people tell me cyclist run stops signs and lights I ask them if they have ever jay walked? That usually shuts them up. If it doesn't I explain that on a bike you have much better visibility than in a car. The same visibility as someone on foot. No one bats an eye at someone jay walking as long as they don't step right in front of their car or bike.


tetris_draftsman
2012-08-10 18:14:27

I try not to jay walk and wait for green. And I always cheer police officers up when they give tickets for jay walking (yeah, once in awhile police gives tickets to pedestrians in downtown).


Big truck and buses have greater visibility than pedestrians and bicyclists.


I think it's dangerous to justify law breaking by "there is no one when traffic light was red". I am in car and traffic light is red and no one is there. Could I go through?


2012-08-10 19:57:30

Whoops....I whiffed on the link. Sorry.


timschooley
2012-08-10 21:23:15

"But bikes are not cars...Nor are cyclists pedestrians, of course (at least not while we’re pedaling). We are a third thing, a distinct mode of transportation, requiring different practices and different rules."


That POV (aka the truth), along with the fact that nearly all traffic lights exist solely to control motor-vehicle traffic, make it perfectly acceptable for a bike to proceed through a red light but unacceptable for a car to do the same.


If you want to know why you are the only car at the intersection, yet you're stuck at a red light, contact your local civil engineer and ask him why his design sucks so much.


2012-08-10 21:32:56

Yeah, this whole debate seems to assume that what's safe for cars must be safe for bikes as well....when staying at lights only means that bikes are bound to stay grouped with cars at a similar pace of traffic. It's nice to read an article such as this that points out that a very different mode of transportation perhaps should be thought about differently in terms of rules of the road.


timschooley
2012-08-11 01:46:50

uh, BSNYC addressed this issue rather succinctly a few days ago.

(Exec Sumry: Ethicist is a douche; or, when is doubt trust Eben.)


ahlir
2012-08-11 01:56:03